We’ll have to agree to disagree, Larry. For the record, not a single piece of my reasoning is at all “self-contradictory”. In fact, with close to 100 footnotes, every piece of my historical accounts and references are validated with well-known and reputable, dare I say “accepted”, mainstream scholarship. None of which is original research. None of my expositions are, as you errantly assert “false ideas”. I will look forward to reading your own book with the same impeccable exegesis and thorough scholarship that my own writing exhibits. Until then …