I am not swayed by being called a heretic, David. But thank you for trying.

Unfortunately, you are being mislead by the traditions of the Church's badly biased interpretation of the "hyper lian apostolos"; I cover this in my book at length.

I am not wrong, unfortunately.

Paul not a legitimate apostle snd was never accepted by the Super Apostles. There is ample extra-biblical history well-documenting these events and the Church manufacturing of the letters of Peter so somehow make it look like Peter and Paul were best buddies. The factual history tells a very different story.

The Church LIED. Forged books that Peter never ever wrote. Not a single Bible scholar worth their salt, both ancient and modern, will tell you that the books of Peter are authentic, unless they are lying.

Finally, I am not proposing a different gospel, I am CORRECTING the errant gospel that Paul manufactured and the later Church adopted. But their Pauline gospel is a lie. It has always been a lie.

Feel free to read my book that describes this in detail. You can find it free online or on Amazon.