Keith Michael
1 min readDec 11, 2022

--

Eric, as a political Libertarian and a bi man, I do not agree with your rather one-sided characterization of this issue.

What the SCOTUS will be determining is "does the State have the right to force someone to do something against their religious conviction".

Furthermore, this places the State in the position of establishing what is and is not "acceptable" religious belief and/or expression. Something ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED by the Constitution.

It's a complex issue that goes way beyond the Gay Community demanding people void their religious convictions so we can somehow "stick it to" evangelicals using the State as our weapon.

If someone doesn't like me or my convictions, I go elsewhere. Why is that so difficult?

Would you want to force a Muslim who didn't like you to officiate your wedding? NO. None of us would ask that of someone, unless we were just doing so to grandstand, which is what the State of CO is doing here.

The bottom line is people "discriminate" all the time. Gay people discriminate against others we don't like for whatever reasons. Everyone does. Is is right? Probably not. But we don't need to legislate this hate of evangelical under the thinly veiled guise of fairness. Fairness is not really what people are after here. REVENGE is.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone ...

--

--

Keith Michael
Keith Michael

Written by Keith Michael

Having spent the better part of 40 years in the Church, I’m on a Crusade with millions of others being led by GOD to Reform the Church. KeithMichael.org

Responses (3)